watch structure

Timothy R. Chavez tinytim at us.ibm.com
Tue Apr 5 17:49:24 UTC 2005


On Tuesday 05 April 2005 10:32 am, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:35 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > Question:  Would it be sane for Tim to go ahead and re-base his patch
> > > to the latest -mm and submit his RFC on linux-fsdevel now even before
> > > resolving the userspace interface issue?
> >
> > I would tentatively say yes. It may take a few days to finalize the list
> > watches. (Changing this structure the first step.) Hopefully, dumping the
> > whole list without a path doesn't change the underlying design in any
> > significant way. If dumping the whole list will change the design, we may
> > need to hold off depending on what the changes involve.
>
> Even if it requires significant internal changes to auditfs, I don't
> think it will have any impact on the hooks in the VFS, which is
> primarily what we need to get feedback on from linux-fsdevel.

Perhaps I should write out a TODO list on the e-mail to fsdevel to minimize 
diversion?

-- 
-tim




More information about the Linux-audit mailing list