audit tree for inclusion in -mm

[Chris Wright]

* Steve Grubb (sgrubb at redhat.com) wrote:
> On Friday 29 April 2005 13:22, Chris Wright wrote:
> > Good, I had same conclusion (esp. for the straight bug fixes).
> 
> What did we decide about the printk issue? Are we going to improve the current 
> patch to clamp at byte 1023 so we don't leak memory?

That's one of the bits I'm looking at in David's tree.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net