[RFC][PATCH] (#4) auditfs
David Woodhouse
dwmw2 at infradead.org
Fri Feb 25 14:33:01 UTC 2005
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 12:13 -0600, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
>I'd like to start getting feedback on linux-fsdevel with a CC directly
>to Al Viro about the design itself. What do you all think of this
>approach? Or perhaps I should bring it directly to LKML? Should I
>wait until the intermediary patch #5 is completed and tested before I
>start any dialog? I personally think overlapping the two would be
>fine. The reason I think this is because the first major stumbling
>block has nothing to do with the implementation itself, but the design
>and all the philosophy and politics surrounding it. As soon as I
>mention "filesystem auditing" I've noticed that people get antsy and
>immediately try to beat it down like a pianta made out of software
>patents J/K. Thus I feel a large part of this endeveour is going to
>revolve around explanation. Do you agree? I'd appreciate some
>feedback.
I agree. Take it to linux-fsdevel. Outline the design and the reason for
it, and show that you're keeping it as unintrusive as it can be.
I don't think you have to have a complete and perfect implementation
before you do so, as long as you don't present your patch as such.
There's not a lot of point in completely finishing it before we show
anything, if we're going to have to make significant changes.
--
dwmw2
More information about the Linux-audit
mailing list