[PATCH] LSPP audit enablement: storing selinux ocontext and scontext

[Dustin Kirkland]

On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 11:48 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> This is true. There are some bugs in the patch. However, we really haven't 
> discussed what the design will look like going forward in LSPP, so this is a 
> little premature.

Bugs in the patch?  I don't doubt you, I'm just curious...  Can you
cite?

> I want to spend a little time drafting up what we need to do and the order in 
> which we integrate the pieces. Another thing that I insist on in the next 
> round of development is to have a config file for LSPP *before* we start 
> coding. I want to make sure that we all agree on how the config looks and 
> that it can truly do the job instead of waiting until the end of development 
> and seeing if we can do what we intended. 

Ok, no problem.  Are you ready to start talking about LSPP now, or is
CAPP still taking all of your time?


:-Dustin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/attachments/20050725/6976af93/attachment.sig>