should we convert struct audit_names to audit_aux_data?

[David Woodhouse]

On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 16:01 -0500, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> Does it not make sense to consolidate all auxiliary data in the
> audit_context to audit_aux_data?  The audit_names structure looks like
> a perfect candidate for audit_aux_data... yes/no?

In general, yes. But I think we're not able to allocate memory for
names. Wasn't this discussed before?

-- 
dwmw2