Opinion please

[Timothy R. Chavez]

On Tuesday 17 May 2005 07:48, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 16:55 -0500, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> > > But I'm not sure whether netlink_unicast is a problem (sure looks like
> > > it - it puts current on a waitqueue for one thing) or what you should
> > > do about it.  You might just need to build a list of things to send
> > > under the rcu_read_lock(), then send each element once you
> > > rcu_read_unlock().
> >
> > Ok, I took this advice, and just went ahead and implemented something
> > very similar.  Good idea Serge.  Thanks.
>
> Yeah, that seems sanest to me.
>
> >  (plus I'm going to patch up to rc4-mm2).
>
> Please don't do that. At this point in time we really need you to be
> working directly on the 2.6.9 RPM kernel primarily. Work on the audit.39
> kernel which was just uploaded to the yum repository.

Sounds reasonable, I'll divert my attention to it...
 
-tim