Oops while checking file system auditing

[David Woodhouse]

On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 13:08 -0500, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> I think we should just rely on on audit_free_aux() to take care of this for us
> because it's not obvious otherwise.  The trade-off is that we have to iterate
> through the list one more time, but I think it's a good trade-off personally.

Yeah, I agree. When I first implemented the aux list it was all stuff
that could just be freed in the loop after it was printed. Now it's more
complex, it makes sense to free it only in audit_free_aux() as you
suggest. I'll do that.
> 
-- 
dwmw2