audit.50 kernel

[David Woodhouse]

On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 10:06 -0500, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> Ok, well... I should just defer my changes to this kernel then since we're 
> going to have to go with the hash table anyway.  Thanks for doing this by the 
> way.

I didn't merge the patches though -- I can still apply the hash table
thing afterwards. I was sort of expecting to have to keep that separate.

-- 
dwmw2