is this message necessary?

[Steve Grubb]

On Wednesday 09 November 2005 18:02, Linda Knippers wrote:
> I'm wondering about the usefulness of this message since it doesn't
> identify the watch that's being removed.

This denotes that a configuration change has occurred. This is needed.

> If we need this message, shouldn't it identify the watch that's being
> removed?  

That would be nice. In the new file system audit code, maybe we can add the 
file name?

Thanks,
-Steve