FYI: 2.6.13.3 Memory leak, names_cache

[Dustin Kirkland]

On 10/7/05, Steve Grubb <sgrubb at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Friday 07 October 2005 12:49, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> > Shouldn't this type of message be CCed to this list?
> 
> Offhand, I don't see the correlation between names_cache and audit
system.

Talked to Steve about this on IRC...  For everyone else, read the rest
of the thread and you'll see that this was caused by audit syscall code.


:-Dustin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/attachments/20051007/20b15237/attachment.sig>