Q: audit log rotation.

Stephen John Smoogen smooge at gmail.com
Tue Apr 18 18:26:32 UTC 2006


On 4/18/06, The UnSeen <ian at south-border.com> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to dictate the format of naming convention of the rotated
> logfiles to better reflect the date range of the data contained in the
> file instead of simply audit.log.1, audit.log.2, etc?  Something perhaps
> defined in the /etc/auditd.conf file?  I'm used to the BSM scheme
> personally.  It would make it easier to manage the files for archiving
> purposes (IMHO).
>
> Also, it would be nice (if it doesn't exist already) to have a way to do
> audit reductions 1 event on a line instead of X lines for an event.


I think there is a set of patches to logrotate in Debian that allows
you to put your rotate format. We had an internal version that rotated
it as .YYYYMMDD for that. I remember there was a bugzilla to add this
for a long time...

>
> Ian
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Linux-audit mailing list
> Linux-audit at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
>


--
Stephen J Smoogen.
CSIRT/Linux System Administrator




More information about the Linux-audit mailing list