[RFC][PATCH] collect security labels on user processes generating audit messages

[Timothy R. Chavez]

On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 10:35 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Thursday 16 February 2006 10:29, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > Except for what other code should do about NULL pointers in output.  If
> > they defer it to vsnprintf, they will end up with <NULL> in the output.
> > So should Tim's code be checking for !ctx and outputting (null) there as
> > well?
> 
> Yes, I think that would be consistent will all the other audit code.
> 
> -Steve
> 

Yes.  I've already made this change.  I just saw that Darren's recent
patch submission included the API work I just did (that he suggested
yesterday)... in the process of testing now.

Thanks.

-tim