[PATCH] filesystem location based auditing

Steve Grubb sgrubb at redhat.com
Mon Feb 27 16:42:23 UTC 2006


On Monday 27 February 2006 11:30, Amy Griffis wrote:
> The last patch I posted was supposed to replace audit-string-2.patch

I must have missed that in the text somewhere...

> (as audit-watch.patch or something similar).  I think if you used the
> git tree ordering, you wouldn't see as many patch collisions.

At this point, your patch is the last one in, so shouldn't it should be 
against what's already in the tree? Its really a lot of trouble to take a 
change in a patch that's in the middle of the stack.

-Steve




More information about the Linux-audit mailing list