auditctl se_sen & se_clr

[Steve Grubb]

On Friday 19 May 2006 15:30, Michael C Thompson wrote:
> This leads me to believe either our definition of se_sen is wrong, or if
> our definition of se_sen is correct, then the implementation of se_sen
> has some bug in it.

You may need to take this discussion to the LSPP mail list where more SE Linux 
folks are watching. Darryl and Dustin did that work. Might be good to ask 
Darryl about this.

-Steve