audit 1.2.2 released

[James Antill]

On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 10:22 -0500, Michael C Thompson wrote:

> This is interesting, that does seem like we're being denied for the 
> first attempt of actions against the kernel... you said you've seen this 
> in the targeted policy? (I've only seen this problem with the MLS policy)

 Yes, it's a mostly vanilla FC5 box using targeted policy (and still
happens when configured in permissive mode).

-- 
James Antill - <james.antill at redhat.com>
> * What is the penalty for using RHEL without paying?
We subscribe them to memo-list. -- Bill Nottingham
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/attachments/20060525/70a2e76f/attachment.sig>