[PATCH v4] selinux: support deferred mapping of contexts

[Steve Grubb]

On Wednesday 07 May 2008 13:20:42 Stephen Smalley wrote:
> then we'd need to define two new fields, one to correspond
> to the real/raw context string corresponding to the scontext and one to
> correspond to the real/raw context string corresponding to the tcontext.
> And they would only be present if the scontext and/or tcontext happened
> to be invalid under current policy.  Maybe "rscontext" and "rtcontext"
> if we don't think that will confuse existing userspace

Sounds good to me. I don't think either names you mentioned are taken.

-Steve