[PATCH] - auditing cmdline

[William Roberts]

Sigh...I sent this back out from another emai address and got bounced
from the lists... resending. Sorry for the cruft.

On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:34 AM, William Roberts <WRoberts at tresys.com> wrote:
> I sent out 3 patches on 12/2/2013. I didn't get any response. I thought I added the right people based on get_maintainers script.
>
> Can anyone comment on these or point me in the right direction?
>
> RGB, Can you at least ACK the audit subsystem patch " audit: Audit proc cmdline value"?
>
> Thank you,
> Bill
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-linux-mm at kvack.org [mailto:owner-linux-mm at kvack.org] On Behalf Of William Roberts
> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 1:11 PM
> To: linux-audit at redhat.com; linux-mm at kvack.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; rgb at redhat.com; viro at zeniv.linux.org.uk
> Cc: sds at tycho.nsa.gov
> Subject: [PATCH] - auditing cmdline
>
> This patch series relates to work started on the audit mailing list.
> It eventually involved touching other modules, so I am trying to pull in those owners as well. In a nutshell I add new utility functions for accessing a processes cmdline value as displayed in proc/<self>/cmdline, and then refactor procfs to use the utility functions, and then add the ability to the audit subsystem to record this value.
>
> Thanks for any feedback and help.
>
> [PATCH 1/3] mm: Create utility functions for accessing a tasks
> [PATCH 2/3] proc: Update get proc_pid_cmdline() to use mm.h helpers
> [PATCH 3/3] audit: Audit proc cmdline value
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo at kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont at kvack.org"> email at kvack.org </a>



-- 
Respectfully,

William C Roberts