[PATCH] Fixed reason field in audit signal logging
Paul Davies C
pauldaviesc at gmail.com
Thu Nov 7 16:00:05 UTC 2013
So we must drop the "reason" field for abnormal end due to signal delivery.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Eric Paris <eparis at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 21:21 +0530, Paul Davies C wrote:
> > So rather than logging the "reason=memory violation" when process ends
> > abnormally due to any signal delivery , it will be be better if we
> > leave "reason=undefined" .
>
> reason=memory_violation or invalid_pointer etc
>
> although maybe it should be just 'signal'... and you can get the signal
> number from the record....
>
> > Your thoughts?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Eric Paris <eparis at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 10:05 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > On Thursday, November 07, 2013 09:43:24 AM Eric Paris wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 19:09 +0530, Paul Davies C wrote:
> > > > > The audit system logs the signals that leads to abnormal
> > end of a process.
> > > > > However , as of now , it always states the reason for
> > failure of a process
> > > > > as "memory violation" regardless of the signal
> > delivered. This is due to
> > > > > the audit_core_dumps() function pass the reason for
> > failure blindly to
> > > > > the audit_log_abend() as "memory violation".
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch changes the audit_core_dumps() function as to
> > pass on the right
> > > > > reason to the audit_log_abend based on the signal
> > received.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by:Paul Davies C
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Eric Paris <eparis at redhat.com>
> > > >
> > > > But we really should wait for an Ack and thoughts from
> > steve grubb....
> > >
> > > I am confused. This is the abnormal end event I have:
> > >
> > > type=ANOM_ABEND msg=audit(1303339663.307:142): auid=4325
> > uid=0 gid=0 ses=1
> > > subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0 pid=3775
> > comm="aureport" sig=11
> > >
> > > Why / when did we start adding text explanations? We should
> > not do that. We
> > > didn't have it before and it should not have been added. The
> > signal number is
> > > enough to identify the problem.
> >
> >
> > We started adding a reason when seccomp started sending
> > ANOM_ABEND
> > events as well. It doesn't do so with a signal. Agreed, the
> > " " is/was
> > a bad idea...
> >
> > >
> > > If we did need a reason= field, all these strings with
> > spaces will get
> > > separated on parsing. They should be like "memory-violation"
> > or "recieved-
> > > abort". And would it be better to hide this in the
> > audit_log_abend function? I
> > > honestly don't understand why this was added.
> > >
> > > -Steve
> > >
> > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > kernel/auditsc.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
> > > > > index 9845cb3..3cafd13 100644
> > > > > --- a/kernel/auditsc.c
> > > > > +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
> > > > > @@ -2395,7 +2395,36 @@ void audit_core_dumps(long signr)
> > > > >
> > > > > ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL,
> > AUDIT_ANOM_ABEND);
> > > > > if (unlikely(!ab))
> > > > >
> > > > > return;
> > > > >
> > > > > - audit_log_abend(ab, "memory violation", signr);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /*Identify the reason for failure based on signal
> > delivered.*/
> > > > > + switch (signr) {
> > > > > + case SIGABRT:
> > > > > + audit_log_abend(ab, "received abort",
> > signr);
> > > > > + break;
> > > > > + case SIGBUS:
> > > > > + audit_log_abend(ab, "invalid pointer
> > dereference", signr);
> > > > > + break;
> > > > > + case SIGFPE:
> > > > > + audit_log_abend(ab, "invalid floating
> > point instruction",
> > > signr);
> > > > > + break;
> > > > > + case SIGILL:
> > > > > + audit_log_abend(ab, "illegal
> > instruction", signr);
> > > > > + break;
> > > > > + case SIGSEGV:
> > > > > + audit_log_abend(ab, "memory
> > violation", signr);
> > > > > + break;
> > > > > + case SIGTRAP:
> > > > > + audit_log_abend(ab, "bad instruction /
> > debugger generated
> > > signal",
> > > > > signr); + break;
> > > > > + case SIGXCPU:
> > > > > + audit_log_abend(ab, "cpu time
> > violation", signr);
> > > > > + break;
> > > > > + case SIGXFSZ:
> > > > > + audit_log_abend(ab, "file size
> > violation", signr);
> > > > > + break;
> > > > > + default:
> > > > > + audit_log_abend(ab, "not defined",
> > signr);
> > > > > + }
> > > > >
> > > > > audit_log_end(ab);
> > > > >
> > > > > }
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Paul Davies C
> > vivafoss.blogspot.com
>
>
>
--
*Regards,*
*Paul Davies C*
vivafoss.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/attachments/20131107/db8a1f79/attachment.htm>
More information about the Linux-audit
mailing list