New draft standards

Richard Guy Briggs rgb at redhat.com
Tue Dec 15 05:11:13 UTC 2015


On 15/12/10, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:43:37 +1100
> > Burn Alting <burn at swtf.dyndns.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Steve,
> >>
> >> Can you mock up some examples of an 'enriched' event showing how it is
> >> different from what we have now.
> >
> > type=LOGIN msg=audit(1449782897.896:2496): pid=1768 uid=0
> > subj=system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 old-auid=4294967295
> > auid=4325 old-ses=4294967295 ses=1 res=1 UID="root" OLD-AUID="unset"
> > AUID="sgrubb"
> >
> > type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1449778741.412:4952): arch=c000003e syscall=40
> > success=no exit=-22 a0=3 a1=0 a2=0 a3=4000 items=0 ppid=7362 pid=7994
> > auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0
> > tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="systemd-coredum"
> > exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-coredump"
> > subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 key="einval-retcode" ARCH=x86_64
> > SYSCALL=sendfile AUID="unset" UID="root" GID="root" EUID="root"
> > SUID="root" FSUID="root" EGID="root" SGID="root" FSGID="root"
> 
> This could be confusing on a system with "unset" as a user.

As we do with "none", "(unset)" might be better?

> paul moore

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs at redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545




More information about the Linux-audit mailing list