[pcmoore-audit:working-testing 5/6] kernel/audit.c:1457:34: error: 'struct mutex' has no member named 'owner'

[Paul Moore]

On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu at intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 08:29:36PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 4:32 PM, kbuild test robot
>> <fengguang.wu at intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> tree:   git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/audit working-testing
>>> head:   a49c8e50dda0d0232dfbed567608724c9666b6ab
>>> commit: 20fb66989030c8f631d687ddaca75b9f7f2ee589 [5/6] Work in progress,
>>> no commit description yet.
>>> config: mips-mtx1_defconfig (attached as .config)
>>> compiler: mipsel-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
>>> reproduce:
>>>         wget
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
>>> -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>>         git checkout 20fb66989030c8f631d687ddaca75b9f7f2ee589
>>>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>>         make.cross ARCH=mips
>>>
>>> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>>
>>>    In file included from include/linux/file.h:8:0,
>>>                     from kernel/audit.c:46:
>>>    kernel/audit.c: In function 'audit_log_start':
>>>>>
>>>>> kernel/audit.c:1457:34: error: 'struct mutex' has no member named
>>>>> 'owner'
>>>
>>>          (ACCESS_ONCE(audit_cmd_mutex.owner) != current)) {
>>
>>
>> Sorry for the noise folks, I wasn't aware the kbuiler robot was
>> watching this branch/repo.  I'll try to move my testing patches to a
>> new repo soon to avoid things like this.
>
> I'm sorry too. The other way is for the robot to only send private
> reports to the committer (ie. you) for the 'working-testing' branch.
> Paul, would you like me to set it up like that?

As long as it is the committer and not the patch author, I think that
would be okay.  Would it be possible to do the same for all branches
other than 'next' and 'stable-*'?

If you are tracking the SELinux repository, you could do the same for that repo.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com