[PATCH V2] audit: normalize NETFILTER_PKT

[Paul Moore]

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2017-02-23 11:57, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > On 2017-02-23 06:20, Florian Westphal wrote:
>> >> Richard Guy Briggs <rgb at redhat.com> wrote:
>> >> > Simplify and eliminate flipping in and out of message fields, relying on nfmark
>> >> > the way we do for audit_key.
>> >> >
>> >> > +struct nfpkt_par {
>> >> > +   int ipv;
>> >> > +   const void *saddr;
>> >> > +   const void *daddr;
>> >> > +   u8 proto;
>> >> > +};
>> >>
>> >> This is problematic, see below for why.
>> >>
>> >> > -static void audit_ip4(struct audit_buffer *ab, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> >> > +static void audit_ip4(struct audit_buffer *ab, struct sk_buff *skb, struct nfpkt_par *apar)
>> >> >  {
>> >> >     struct iphdr _iph;
>> >> >     const struct iphdr *ih;
>> >> >
>> >> > +   apar->ipv = 4;
>> >> >     ih = skb_header_pointer(skb, 0, sizeof(_iph), &_iph);
>> >> > -   if (!ih) {
>> >> > -           audit_log_format(ab, " truncated=1");
>> >> > +   if (!ih)
>> >> >             return;
>> >>
>> >> Removing this "truncated" has the consequence that this can later log
>> >> "saddr=0.0.0.0 daddr=0.0.0.0" if we return here.
>> >>
>> >> This cannot happen for ip(6)tables because ip stack discards broken l3 headers
>> >> before the netfilter hooks get called, but its possible with NFPROTO_BRIDGE.
>> >>
>> >> Perhaps you will need to change audit_ip4/6 to return "false" when it can't
>> >> get the l3 information now so we only log zero addresses when the packet
>> >> really did contain them.
>> >
>> > Ok, to clarify the implications, are you saying that handing a NULL
>> > pointer to "saddr=%pI4" will print "0.0.0.0" rather than "(none)" or "?"
>>
>> My initial reaction is that if the packet is so badly
>> truncated/malformed that we don't have a full IP header than we should
>> just refrain from logging the packet; it's too malformed/garbage to
>> offer any useful information and the normal packet processing should
>> result in the packet being discarded anyway.
>
> Which is why I wanted the ethertype, but that can be coded into the nfmark.

If the packet is garbage (garbage without any payload in this case),
what does it matter?  It's noise.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com