filename not audited for openat() on F28

Mon Apr 23 15:29:31 UTC 2018

On Monday, April 23, 2018 6:24:52 AM EDT Jiri Jaburek wrote:
> On 04/20/18 15:37, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Friday, April 20, 2018 9:20:29 AM EDT Jiri Jaburek wrote:
> >> (Please CC me on replies.)
> >> 
> >> Hello,
> >> I'm trying to run the audit-test suite on Fedora 28 and am running into
> >> it expecting a name= field in the SYSCALL entry.
> >> 
> >> augrok --seek=697600 -m1 type==SYSCALL         syscall=openat success=no
> >> pid=3951 auid=1000         uid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0         gid=0
> >> egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 exit=-13
> >> subj=staff_u:lspp_test_r:lspp_test_generic_t:SystemHigh
> >> name=tmp.owfFtgPOjx/new
> >> 
> >> Fedora 28:
> >> 
> >> ----
> >> time->Fri Apr 20 15:04:59 2018
> >> type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(1524229499.918:366591):
> >> proctitle=2F62696E2F62617368002E2F72756E2E62617368002D647600323734
> >> type=PATH msg=audit(1524229499.918:366591): item=0
> >> name="tmp.J4IQL7Buxe/" inode=1055495 dev=fd:02 mode=040700 ouid=0 ogid=0
> >> rdev=00:00 obj=staff_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s15:c0.c1023 nametype=PARENT
> >> cap_fp=0000000000000000 cap_fi=0000000000000000 cap_fe=0 cap_fver=0
> >> type=CWD msg=audit(1524229499.918:366591):
> >> cwd="/usr/local/eal4_testing/audit-test/syscalls"
> >> type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1524229499.918:366591): arch=c000003e syscall=257
> >> success=no exit=-13 a0=3 a1=7ffc02f0eaf6 a2=c0 a3=16b6010 items=1
> >> ppid=5275 pid=5276 auid=1000 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0
> >> sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=2 comm="do_openat"
> >> exe="/usr/local/eal4_testing/audit-test/utils/bin/do_openat"
> >> subj=staff_u:lspp_test_r:lspp_test_generic_t:s15:c0.c1023 key=(null)
> >> type=AVC msg=audit(1524229499.918:366591): avc:  denied  { create } for
> >> pid=5276 comm="do_openat" name="new"
> >> scontext=staff_u:lspp_test_r:lspp_test_generic_t:s15:c0.c1023
> >> tcontext=staff_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0
> >> ----
> >> 
> >> RHEL-7.5:
> >> 
> >> ----
> >> time->Fri Apr 20 15:06:59 2018
> >> type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(1524229619.726:56605):
> >> proctitle=72756E636F6E0073746166665F753A6C7370705F746573745F723A6C737070
> >> 5F7
> >> 46573745F67656E657269635F743A53797374656D4869676800646F5F6F70656E617400
> >> 2F74
> >> 6D7000746D702E30674C74574A336977622F6E6577006372656174650073746166665F7
> >> 53A6 F626A6563745F723A757365725F746D705F743A53 type=PATH
> >> msg=audit(1524229619.726:56605): item=1
> >> name="tmp.0gLtWJ3iwb/new" objtype=CREATE cap_fp=0000000000000000
> >> cap_fi=0000000000000000 cap_fe=0 cap_fver=0
> >> type=PATH msg=audit(1524229619.726:56605): item=0 name="tmp.0gLtWJ3iwb/"
> >> inode=1055489 dev=fd:02 mode=040700 ouid=0 ogid=0 rdev=00:00
> >> obj=staff_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s15:c0.c1023 objtype=PARENT
> >> cap_fp=0000000000000000 cap_fi=0000000000000000 cap_fe=0 cap_fver=0
> >> type=CWD msg=audit(1524229619.726:56605):
> >> cwd="/usr/local/eal4_testing/audit-test/syscalls"
> >> type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1524229619.726:56605): arch=c000003e syscall=257
> >> success=no exit=-13 a0=3 a1=7ffc1ecd6b57 a2=c0 a3=0 items=2 ppid=20750
> >> pid=20751 auid=1000 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0
> >> fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=1595 comm="do_openat"
> >> exe="/usr/local/eal4_testing/audit-test/utils/bin/do_openat"
> >> subj=staff_u:lspp_test_r:lspp_test_generic_t:s15:c0.c1023 key=(null)
> >> ----
> >> 
> >> The key difference here is probably the absence of
> >> 
> >> type=PATH msg=audit(1524229619.726:56605): item=1
> >> name="tmp.0gLtWJ3iwb/new" objtype=CREATE cap_fp=0000000000000000
> >> cap_fi=0000000000000000 cap_fe=0 cap_fver=0
> >> 
> >> on Fedora 28, which augrok looks for.
> >> 
> >> Is this expected?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I'm seeing something similar with other syscalls like
> >> 
> >> creat("/tmp/tmp.9EsMgMuio7/new", 0700)
> >> 
> >> producing
> >> 
> >> ----
> >> type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(04/20/2018 15:15:35.547:371576) :
> >> proctitle=runcon staff_u:lspp_test_r:lspp_test_generic_t:SystemHigh
> >> do_creat /tmp/tmp.9EsMgMuio7/new staff_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:SystemLow
> >> type=PATH msg=audit(04/20/2018 15:15:35.547:371576) : item=0
> >> name=/tmp/tmp.9EsMgMuio7/ inode=1572964 dev=fd:02 mode=dir,700 ouid=root
> >> ogid=root rdev=00:00 obj=staff_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s15:c0.c1023
> >> nametype=PARENT cap_fp=none cap_fi=none cap_fe=0 cap_fver=0
> >> type=CWD msg=audit(04/20/2018 15:15:35.547:371576) :
> >> cwd=/usr/local/eal4_testing/audit-test/syscalls
> >> type=SYSCALL msg=audit(04/20/2018 15:15:35.547:371576) : arch=x86_64
> >> syscall=creat success=no exit=EACCES(Permission denied)
> >> a0=0x7ffc41d04af9 a1=0700 a2=0x0 a3=0x0 items=1 ppid=6779 pid=6780
> >> auid=eal uid=root gid=root euid=root suid=root fsuid=root egid=root
> >> sgid=root fsgid=root tty=(none) ses=2 comm=do_creat
> >> exe=/usr/local/eal4_testing/audit-test/utils/bin/do_creat
> >> subj=staff_u:lspp_test_r:lspp_test_generic_t:s15:c0.c1023 key=(null)
> >> type=AVC msg=audit(04/20/2018 15:15:35.547:371576) : avc:  denied  {
> >> create } for  pid=6780 comm=do_creat name=new
> >> scontext=staff_u:lspp_test_r:lspp_test_generic_t:s15:c0.c1023
> >> tcontext=staff_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0
> > 
> > This record says you were denied create. That means it can report the
> > parent object and its properties. But it cannot report on the object
> > being created because it has no properties except an intended name. But
> > it has no device, inode, owner, label, etc. If the system were in
> > permissive mode, you will probably get the actual object and its
> > properties.
> 
> Thanks, however I don't know if the reply was to openat() or creat() 

Both have a denial AVC for the action that the syscall is performing.

> and I also don't know if it's an expected change compared to RHEL-7 or if
> I should treat it as bug.

The current behavior is a change. I suspect that because the name is about 
all we have at this point, the record was dropped because it cannot be 
normalized. IOW, its missing a bunch of fields. The old behavior is nice, 
though, because you can see what was denied. 

I don't know if this is considered a bug. Paul or Richard might need to say 
if this is the new behavior going forward.

-Steve

> >> ----
> >> 
> >> but the lack of "/new" in PATH here seems more like a bug.
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> Jiri
> >> 
> >> --
> >> Linux-audit mailing list
> >> Linux-audit at redhat.com
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit