Monitoring files

[Steve Grubb]

On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 9:12:49 PM EDT warron.french wrote:
> Steve, I did a search on the manpage for auditctl and there was no
> references to any -i switch;
>    of course it could be because the version we are on might be too old in
> comparison.

This is what the auditctl man page says from audit-1.0.16:

-i     Ignore errors when reading rules from a file

I hope you are not using anything less than that.

-Steve


> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:43 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 2018-04-24 18:04, warron.french wrote:
> > > Furthermore, where would I add the -i switch to a rule like this one:
> > > 
> > > -a always,exit -F path=/usr/bin/cgclassify -F perm=x -F auid>=1000 -F
> > > auid!=4294967295 -k privileged
> > 
> > I'm not aware of any per-rule switches to permit failure to load to be
> > non-fatal.  I was suggesting it might help in your situation to add such
> > a feature, but I think the better solution is a customized rule set for
> > each machine or type of machine.
> > 
> > > ??
> > > 
> > > --------------------------
> > > Warron French
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 6:03 PM, warron.french
> > > <warron.french at gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > wrote:
> > > > Mr. Briggs/Rafi,
> > > > 
> > > > I don't see the -i switch even mentioned in the manpage for
> > 
> > audit.rules.
> > 
> > > > Is this a documented switch, or not yet a capability on Red Hat or
> > 
> > CentOS
> > 
> > > > systems?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > 
> > > > --------------------------
> > > > Warron French
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb at redhat.com>
> > > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >> On 2018-04-23 23:41, F Rafi wrote:
> > > >> > Adding a -i to the rules file should ignore any errors.
> > > >> 
> > > >> At risk of feature creep, it might be nice to have a flag to ignore
> > > >> certain rules but not others, a way to tag individual rules with
> > 
> > either
> > 
> > > >> a must, or a different tag with "ignore if not present" for file
> > 
> > rules.
> > 
> > > >> > -Farhan
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:19 PM, warron.french <
> > 
> > warron.french at gmail.com>
> > 
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > Hi, I have a requirement to monitor a ton of files, executables
> > 
> > and
> > 
> > > >> confug
> > > >> 
> > > >> > > files.
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > Anyway, not all of my systems have every file in the list; and
> > 
> > when I
> > 
> > > >> add
> > > >> 
> > > >> > > the rules appropriate, either as a Watch (-w) rule or as an
> > > >> > > Action
> > > >> 
> > > >> (-a)
> > > >> 
> > > >> > > rule, the rules stop loading when the find a rule that has a
> > > >> > > file
> > 
> > that
> > 
> > > >> > > doesn't exist *on that particular system*.
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > This is the intended effect, yes?
> > > >> > > 
> > > >> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > >> > > --------------------------
> > > >> > > Warron French
> > > >> 
> > > >> - RGB
> > > >> 
> > > >> --
> > > >> Richard Guy Briggs <rgb at redhat.com>
> > > >> Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
> > > >> Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
> > > >> IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
> > > >> Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635
> > 
> > - RGB
> > 
> > --
> > Richard Guy Briggs <rgb at redhat.com>
> > Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
> > Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
> > IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
> > Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635