[RFC PATCH] audit-testsuite: tests for subject and object correctness

[Casey Schaufler]

On 11/2/2020 2:08 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 2020-11-02 13:54, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> Verify that there are subj= and obj= fields in a record
>> if and only if they are expected. A system without a security
>> module that provides these fields should not include them.
>> A system with multiple security modules providing these fields
>> (e.g. SELinux and AppArmor) should always provide "?" for the
>> data and also include a AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS or
>> AUDIT_MAC_OBJ_CONTEXTS record. The test uses the LSM list from
>> /sys/kernel/security/lsm to determine which format is expected.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey at schaufler-ca.com>
>> ---
>>  tests/Makefile                   |   1 +
>>  tests/multiple_contexts/Makefile |  12 +++
>>  tests/multiple_contexts/test     | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 179 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 tests/multiple_contexts/Makefile
>>  create mode 100755 tests/multiple_contexts/test
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/Makefile b/tests/Makefile
>> index a7f242a..f20f6b1 100644
>> --- a/tests/Makefile
>> +++ b/tests/Makefile
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ TESTS := \
>>  	file_create \
>>  	file_delete \
>>  	file_rename \
>> +	multiple_contexts \
> "context" is a bit ambiguous.  Could this be named something to indicate
> a security context rather than any other sort, such as audit or user
> context?

Would "subj_obj_fields" be better?