[RFC PATCH v2 0/9] Add LSM access controls and auditing to io_uring

[Steve Grubb]

Hello,

Since this is a chat to discuss merging the user space piece, I trimmed the 
recipients down to the audit community.

On Thursday, September 9, 2021 8:58:58 PM EDT Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > I spent some time this morning/afternoon playing with the io_uring
> > audit filtering capability and with your audit userspace
> > ghau-iouring-filtering.v1.0 branch it appears to work correctly.  Yes,
> > the userspace tooling isn't quite 100% yet (e.g. `auditctl -l` doesn't
> > map the io_uring ops correctly), but I know you mentioned you have a
> > number of fixes/improvements still as a work-in-progress there so I'm
> > not too concerned.  The important part is that the kernel pieces look
> > to be working correctly.
> 
> Ok, I have squashed and pushed the audit userspace support for iouring:
>        
> https://github.com/rgbriggs/audit-userspace/commit/e8bd8d2ea8adcaa758024cb
> 9b8fa93895ae35eea
> https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/compare/master...rgbriggs:g
> hak-iouring-filtering.v2.1 There are test rpms for f35 here:
>         http://people.redhat.com/~rbriggs/ghak-iouring/git-e8bd8d2-fc35/
> 
> userspace v2 changelog:
> - check for watch before adding perm
> - update manpage to include filesystem filter
> - update support for the uring filter list: doc, -U op, op names
> - add support for the AUDIT_URINGOP record type
> - add uringop support to ausearch
> - add uringop support to aureport
> - lots of bug fixes
> 
> "auditctl -a uring,always -S ..." will now throw an error and require
> "-U" instead.

OK, now that the bug fix release is out of the way, let's start merging this 
into user space. I think we should start with the code that let's auditd 
write the record correctly and then the auditctl piece that inserts the rule 
into the kernel. Those should be easy to merge.

I see one section of code that mirrors all of the operations in ioring.h. I 
thought that Paul only wanted to audit some of the operations and not all of 
them. Did that change? Are we really going to allow auditing reads on ioring? 
I would also prefer that we use the ioring enums rather than maintain a 
number mapping of all of the ioring enums text representation.

But let's start with this piece first. Send just the auditctl/auditd pieces 
and let's start merging that. We'll get to the other pieces after that.

Thanks,
-Steve