[Linux-cachefs] Possible patch for CacheFiles: I/O Error: Unlink failed
Greg M
gregm at servu.net.au
Thu Apr 1 16:21:46 UTC 2010
Success! The bug that had been plaguing me for month is now fixed, however
the load seems to be unusually high:
top - 11:16:31 up 52 min, 2 users, load average: 6.85, 3.83, 2.29
Tasks: 96 total, 4 running, 92 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu0 : 0.9%us, 3.5%sy, 0.0%ni, 10.0%id, 81.7%wa, 1.3%hi, 2.6%si,
0.0%st
Cpu1 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si,
0.0%st
Cpu2 : 1.7%us, 1.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 95.7%id, 1.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si,
0.0%st
Cpu3 : 0.0%us, 34.9%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 65.1%si,
0.0%st
Mem: 4057892k total, 2616856k used, 1441036k free, 1087752k buffers
Swap: 2104504k total, 0k used, 2104504k free, 1112304k cached
>From what I can tell, this is due to massive writes on the disk
Atop:
DSK | sdb | busy 188% | read 0 | write 353 |
MBw/s 1.32 | avio 6.06 ms |
NET | eth0 2% | pcki 6058 | pcko 7562 | si 8954 Kbps |
so 25 Mbps | erro 0 |
Hopefully it will settle down.
Also - Is it possible to use a RAMdisk for /var/fscache?
This would obviously provide 4GB of super fast caching .
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cachefs-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:linux-cachefs-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of David Howells
Sent: Thursday, 1 April 2010 10:05 PM
To: Greg M
Cc: 'Linux filesystem caching discussion list'
Subject: Re: [Linux-cachefs] Possible patch for CacheFiles: I/O Error:
Unlink failed
Greg M <gregm at servu.net.au> wrote:
> I've extracted the below code but get the following error after
> applying to
> 2.6.33(0)
I'm using 2.6.34-rc3. Does using that help?
> (Noting patches 1-5 are the patches you've put in the list in the last
> 2 weeks).
What do you mean by that?
David
--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
More information about the Linux-cachefs
mailing list