[Linux-cachefs] [PATCH] Remove EXPERIMENTAL from NFS_FSCACHE
Christian Kujau
lists at nerdbynature.de
Sat Feb 27 04:14:57 UTC 2010
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 at 17:25, David Howells wrote:
> fs/nfs/Kconfig | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Thanks for pushing this, David. And to be somehwat consistent (and since
the merge window is still open), here's another one to remove EXPERIMENTAL
from FSCACHE. I'm not touching the other *_FSCACHE options (AFS, 9P), as I
don't know if they're working well enough.
One more thing: last time I began my "reasoning" with "There's a bug in
Ubuntu..." - let me just be clear here that this is not the main
reasoning. I'm not too fond of Ubuntu's plan to "only include features
without EXPERIMENTAL set - and I realize that it's not upstream's job to
randomly mark Kconfig options in a way so that distribution XY is happy.
However, I was more impressed by Arjan's comment that the EXPERIMENTAL
flag is bogus anyway - so I figured we can get 2 things at once: remove a
(now) bogus flag and make a distribution happy :-) Hope that's OK.
Remove EXPERIMENTAL flag from FSCACHE
Signed-off-by: Christian Kujau <lists at nerdbynature.de>
diff --git a/fs/fscache/Kconfig b/fs/fscache/Kconfig
index 864dac2..cc94bb9 100644
--- a/fs/fscache/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/fscache/Kconfig
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
config FSCACHE
tristate "General filesystem local caching manager"
- depends on EXPERIMENTAL
select SLOW_WORK
help
This option enables a generic filesystem caching manager that can be
--
BOFH excuse #101:
Collapsed Backbone
More information about the Linux-cachefs
mailing list