[Linux-cluster] GFS 6.0 node without quorum tries to fence
Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra
mtilstra at redhat.com
Tue Aug 3 18:44:37 UTC 2004
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:03:40AM -0700, Steve Landherr wrote:
> Agreed. But I though that the quorum concept was there to protect
> against a netsplit causing independent clusters to form. If I'm a node
> and I can't contact enough peers to gain quorum, then I can't be a part
> of the cluster. If I'm not part of the cluster, then I shouldn't be
> fencing other nodes.
>
> Am I missing something?
In a lights out setup. (no user required to keep things running) 2 of
three nodes go AWOL. One node now needs to reset (NPS fencing) the
other two, without quorum, to keep things running.
--
Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra
A hacker is a machine for turning caffeine into code.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20040803/b4889596/attachment.sig>
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list