[Linux-cluster] unable to mount gfs partition

[Chicago Boy]

Thank you very much for replying to my post!

The fencing method is set to manual. Is there a way to
check what nodes are waiting for fencing to complete.
I didn't notice any such messages in /var/log/message

When I run `gulm_tool nodelist localhost` on the node
lock server(node1) is running it printed node1
information. It didn't indicate that node2 is pending
for fencing. Also, I tried fence_manual -s node2
earlier. The command just hung up without returning to
prompt. I terminated with ctrl-c.

Name: node2
  ip    = 127.0.0.1
  state = Logged in
  mode = Master
  missed beats = 0
  last beat = 1100816791202103
  delay avg = 10014958
  max delay = 10020006

I read in another post about loopback address problem:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/2004-August/msg00004.html

It looks like node1 that is running lock_server picked
up 127.0.0.1. Could this be the problem?

Thanks again for your help!

SD

--- Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra
<mtilstra at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 01:15:40PM -0800, Chicago
> Boy wrote:
> > lock_gulmd[18399]: You are running in Standard
> mode.
> > lock_gulmd[18399]: I am (clu2.abc.com) with ip
> > (192.168.11.212)
> > lock_gulmd[18399]: Forked core [18400].
> > lock_gulmd_core[18400]: ERROR [core_io.c:1029] Got
> > error from reply: (clu1:192.
> > 168.11.211) 1006:Not Allowed
> 
> Typically means that the node is pending on a
> fencing action. (the node
> that is trying to login is expired, and cannot login
> until fencing
> completes.)
> 
> run `gulm_tool nodelist localhost` on the first node
> to verify this.
> 
> you'll then need to figure out why the fencing
> action didn't work.
> -- 
> Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra
> Drive defensively.  Buy a tank.
> 

> ATTACHMENT part 1.2 application/pgp-signature 
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com