[Linux-cluster] Re: pool and LVM, and changes since 2000

Wed Oct 6 16:36:43 UTC 2004

On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 12:17:49PM -0400, Ed L Cashin wrote:
> Will DLM + cman make GULM unnecessary?
yes.

> Or will we still have GULM when DLM and cman are in widespread use?
most probably, in some fashion.

> If so, what will its role then be?
I don't know.

-- 
Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra
Death is life's way of telling you you've been fired.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20041006/4aade158/attachment.sig>