[Linux-cluster] Interfacing csnap to cluster stack
Daniel Phillips
phillips at redhat.com
Thu Oct 7 17:58:50 UTC 2004
On Thursday 07 October 2004 12:08, Lon Hohberger wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 02:07, David Teigland wrote:
> > Using DLM locks is a third way you might
> > solve this problem without using SM or RM; I don't understand the
> > details of how that might work yet but it sounds interesting.
>
> It's primarily because it assumes that the DLM or GuLM can ensure
> that only one exclusive lock is granted at a time. Because of this,
> the holder of the lock would thereby become the csnap master server,
> and the old master will either have been fenced or relinquished its
> duties willfully (and thus is no longer a threat).
Suppose that the winner of the race to get the exclusive lock is a bad
choice to run the server. Perhaps it has a fast connection to the net
but is connected to the disk over the network instead of directly like
the other nodes. How do you fix that, within this model?
Regards,
Daniel
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list