[Linux-cluster] Subversion?

[Bastian Blank]

On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 10:07:22AM -0700, John Cherry wrote:
> I understand that subversion is quite nice, but kernel developers have
> adopted bitkeeper (at least Linus and several of his maintainers). 
> While you may not need all the distributed capabilities of bitkeeper
> now, it is sure nice to have a tool that allows for non-local
> repositories and change set tracking outside of the main repository (as
> Kevin so clearly stated).

Do you think, redhat will provide bk licenses for people which don't get
a free one? I'm a subversion and svk developer and will not get one
because of this.

Bastian

-- 
Without freedom of choice there is no creativity.
		-- Kirk, "The return of the Archons", stardate 3157.4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20040925/e3fa3723/attachment.sig>