[Linux-cluster] Re: GFS
Pekka J Enberg
penberg at cs.helsinki.fi
Mon Aug 8 10:57:55 UTC 2005
David Teigland writes:
> > but why can't you return NULL here on failure like you do for
> > find_lock_page()?
>
> because create is set
Yes, but looking at (some of the) top-level callers, there's no real reason
why create must not fail. Am I missing something here?
> > gfs2-02.patch:+ RETRY_MALLOC(bd = kmem_cache_alloc(gfs2_bufdata_cachep,
> > GFP_KERNEL),
> > -> GFP_NOFAIL
>
> It looks to me like NOFAIL does nothing for kmem_cache_alloc().
> Am I seeing that wrong?
It is passed to the page allocator just like with kmalloc() which uses
__cache_alloc() too.
Pekka
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list