[Linux-cluster] Where to go with cman ?
Patrick Caulfield
pcaulfie at redhat.com
Mon Aug 8 15:30:43 UTC 2005
Steven Dake wrote:
> Thats great news Patrick. One thing you should be aware of is that I
> have changed some of the internal interfaces in preparation for others
> to use libtotem to be extremely more sanitary. Unfortunately I may have
> done this a little too late in your case.. But I think you will find
> things are a little better. It really only effects totempg_initialize.
> Also libtotem was renamed to libtotem_pg because of requests from Daniel
> about a name-space collision with some movie player in fc4.
Yes I spotted that, my current "nearly-working" cman is based on the latest SVN
sources.
> For multihoming, I want to support the totem redundant ring protocol in
> the totem code. This is an extension of totemsrp to support multiple
> nics per processor. Then data is either actively or passively
> replicated over multiple links. There is essentially no failover and
> multiple links can offer better performance and still operate properly
> when one entire network fails. It looks pretty simple to implement.
> The paper is at:
>
> http://www.rcsc.de/pdf/icdcs02.pdf
Excellent, thanks. I'll have a read.
--
patrick
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list