[Linux-cluster] Clustered LDAP, good or bad idea?

Adam Cassar adam.cassar at netregistry.com.au
Tue Aug 9 12:11:35 UTC 2005


We run openldap quite extensively here. In my experience, if slapd fails 
it is usually due to some backend db issue, and gfs will not help you 
with that.

A master slave set up will be your best option.

Lon Hohberger wrote:

>On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 19:08 -0600, Ryan Thomson wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I'm a bit concerned about failures since I can't test that properly in a
>>two-node cluster.
>>
>>I suppose what I'm really asking is this: Is running LDAP as a cluster
>>service a particularly bad idea for any reason?
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Not that I'm aware of.  I had one running a while for a reason which
>I've since forgotten (I stopped it on 29-Mar-2005, and has never been
>restarted).  However, that LDAP server was only for testing; I've never
>run one in production.
>
>-- Lon
>
>--
>Linux-cluster mailing list
>Linux-cluster at redhat.com
>http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>  
>




More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list