[Linux-cluster] Re: GFS
Mark Fasheh
mark.fasheh at oracle.com
Wed Aug 10 18:21:56 UTC 2005
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:57:43PM +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Surely avoiding them is preferred but how do you do that when you have to
> mmap'd regions where userspace does memcpy()? The kernel won't much saying
> in it until ->nopage. We cannot grab all the required locks in proper order
> here because we don't know what size the buffer is. That's why I think lock
> sorting won't work of all the cases and thus the problem needs to be taken
> care of by the dlm.
Hmm, well today in OCFS2 if you're not coming from read or write, the lock
is held only for the duration of ->nopage so I don't think we could get into
any deadlocks for that usage.
--Mark
--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
mark.fasheh at oracle.com
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list