[Linux-cluster] cman bad generation number

Patrick Caulfield pcaulfie at redhat.com
Wed Jan 12 08:58:12 UTC 2005

On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 05:00:46PM -0800, Daniel McNeil wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 00:56, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 09:33:39AM -0800, Daniel McNeil wrote:
> > > How long does cman stay up in your testing?
> > 
> > With the higher pririty on the heartbeat thread I got 5 days before iSCSI died
> > on me again... This isn't quite the same load as yours but it is on 8 busy nodes.
> I have not seen 5 days yet on my set.  See my email from yesterday.
> Is the code to have higher priority for the heartbeat thread
> already checked in?  I restarted my test yesterday and it is
> still going, but it usually has trouble after 50 hours or so.

It's rev 1.45 of membership.c checked in on the 7th Jan. If that hasn't fixed it
I'll have to dabble with realtime things as it does seem now that the threads
are not being woken up, even though the timer is firing.



More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list