[Linux-cluster] Fencing Problems
Lon Hohberger
lhh at redhat.com
Tue Jul 5 14:49:47 UTC 2005
Andrew Forgue (forgue at oakland.edu) wrote:
> Would this be possible if GFS implemented an on-disk quota system?
(Quorum?)
In either case (quorum *or* quota), fencing is still required, as there's no
assurance that a rogue node can't flush buffers.
Fencing *forcefully* prevents nodes from flushing any outstanding buffers to
disk after we've declared them out of the cluster, regardless of the
membership/quorum model used.
-- Lon
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list