[Linux-cluster] Fencing Problems
Andrew Forgue
forgue at oakland.edu
Tue Jul 5 14:30:45 UTC 2005
Patrick Caulfield wrote:
>
>Data integrity requires that the remaining node knows for sure that the other
>node has been removed from the cluster. Without that assurance your data is toast.
>
Would this be possible if GFS implemented an on-disk quota system?
--
Andrew J. Forgue
Systems Programmer II :: Oakland University
forgue at oakland.edu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20050705/9f692d8b/attachment.sig>
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list