[Linux-cluster] GFS compile errors on FC3

AJ Lewis alewis at redhat.com
Tue Jun 7 14:52:18 UTC 2005


On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:40:36PM +0200, Birger Wathne wrote:
> Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra wrote:
> 
> >
> >depends, if you're just playing with it, and got HEAD working, then
> >you're ok.  If you actually want to use it in a production system then
> >you should look into the RHEL4 or RHEL4U1 branches.
> >
> 
> I'm planning on going into production *very* soon. I am currently running 
> FC3 and the RHEL4 branch. Should I go for FC4 as soon as it gets released 
> and the FC4 branch instead? I can wait for that unless FC4 gets further 
> delayed.
> 
> I am a bit weary... Whenever I stop my services and unmount filesystems to 
> do a gfs_fsck on them I get errors. Differing bitmaps, etc, etc. This is 
> with only one node in my cluster, and no heavy usage yet. Scares me a 
> little :-) Any comments? Is this normal? Critical? Is this code production 
> ready?

If you could send the output of the fsck that you're seeing, I can probably
tell you if it's an issue or not.

Regards,
-- 
AJ Lewis                                   Voice:  612-638-0500
Red Hat Inc.                               E-Mail: alewis at redhat.com
One Main Street SE, Suite 209
Minneapolis, MN 55414
   
Current GPG fingerprint = D9F8 EDCE 4242 855F A03D  9B63 F50C 54A8 578C 8715
Grab the key at: http://people.redhat.com/alewis/gpg.html or one of the
many keyservers out there...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20050607/3de295d1/attachment.sig>


More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list