[Linux-cluster] umount failed - device is busy
Herta Van den Eynde
herta.vandeneynde at cc.kuleuven.be
Mon Oct 10 20:06:54 UTC 2005
Lon Hohberger wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 17:59 +0200, Herta Van den Eynde wrote:
>
>>Further investigation suggests that locking may have something to do
>>with this.
>>On the system that currently runs the services, I find these lock files
>>in four
>>-rwx------ 1 root root 0 Oct 8 03:30 lock.0
>>-rwx------ 1 root root 0 Oct 8 03:30 lock.1
>>-rwx------ 1 root root 0 Oct 8 03:30 lock.116
>>-rwx------ 1 root root 0 Oct 8 03:30 lock.2
>>-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Oct 8 03:31 service.0
>>-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Oct 10 16:08 service.1
>>-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Oct 8 03:30 service.2
>
>
>>On the now idel cluster member, I have these lock files:
>>-rwx------ 1 root root 0 Oct 8 03:30 lock.0
>>-rwx------ 1 root root 0 Oct 8 03:30 lock.1
>>-rwx------ 1 root root 0 Oct 8 03:30 lock.116
>>-rwx------ 1 root root 0 Oct 8 03:30 lock.2
>
>
> Lock files aren't removed.
>
>
>>The four lock.n files strike me as odd since I only have three services.
>
>
> One is the configuration lock.
>
>
>> Also, should the lock files even be there on the idle cluster member?
>
>
> Yes.
>
> Did you try enabling force unmount in the device/file system
> configuration?
>
> -- Lon
Thanks for the explanation, Lon. Yes, the devices are configured for
"Force Unmount".
With the device unmounted on all of the nfs clients I even tried to
'umount -f' manually, but I got the same result.
Kind regards,
Herta
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list