[Linux-cluster] umount failed - device is busy

Herta Van den Eynde herta.vandeneynde at cc.kuleuven.be
Mon Oct 10 20:06:54 UTC 2005


Lon Hohberger wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 17:59 +0200, Herta Van den Eynde wrote:
> 
>>Further investigation suggests that locking may have something to do 
>>with this.
>>On the system that currently runs the services, I find these lock files 
>>in four
>>-rwx------    1 root     root            0 Oct  8 03:30 lock.0
>>-rwx------    1 root     root            0 Oct  8 03:30 lock.1
>>-rwx------    1 root     root            0 Oct  8 03:30 lock.116
>>-rwx------    1 root     root            0 Oct  8 03:30 lock.2
>>-rw-r--r--    1 root     root            0 Oct  8 03:31 service.0
>>-rw-r--r--    1 root     root            0 Oct 10 16:08 service.1
>>-rw-r--r--    1 root     root            0 Oct  8 03:30 service.2
> 
> 
>>On the now idel cluster member, I have these lock files:
>>-rwx------    1 root     root            0 Oct  8 03:30 lock.0
>>-rwx------    1 root     root            0 Oct  8 03:30 lock.1
>>-rwx------    1 root     root            0 Oct  8 03:30 lock.116
>>-rwx------    1 root     root            0 Oct  8 03:30 lock.2
> 
> 
> Lock files aren't removed.
> 
> 
>>The four lock.n files strike me as odd since I only have three services. 
> 
> 
> One is the configuration lock.
> 
> 
>>  Also, should the lock files even be there on the idle cluster member?
> 
> 
> Yes.
> 
> Did you try enabling force unmount in the device/file system
> configuration?
> 
> -- Lon

Thanks for the explanation, Lon.  Yes, the devices are configured for 
"Force Unmount".
With the device unmounted on all of the nfs clients I even tried to 
'umount -f' manually, but I got the same result.

Kind regards,

Herta

Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm




More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list