[Linux-cluster] Re: GFS, what's remaining

[Pekka Enberg]

On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:35:23PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > +void gfs2_glock_hold(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
> > +{
> > +     glock_hold(gl);
> > +}
> >
> > eh why?

On 9/5/05, David Teigland <teigland at redhat.com> wrote:
> You removed the comment stating exactly why, see below.  If that's not a
> accepted technique in the kernel, say so and I'll be happy to change it
> here and elsewhere.

Is there a reason why users of gfs2_glock_hold() cannot use
glock_hold() directly?

                            Pekka