[Linux-cluster] Using GFS without a network?
Steve Wilcox
spwilcox at att.com
Wed Sep 7 03:03:57 UTC 2005
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 20:06 -0400, Steve Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 00:57 +0200, Andreas Brosche wrote:
>
> > > - Multi-initator SCSI buses do not work with GFS in any meaningful way,
> > > regardless of what the host controller is.
> > > Ex: Two machines with different SCSI IDs on their initiator connected to
> > > the same physical SCSI bus.
> >
> > Hmm... don't laugh at me, but in fact that's what we're about to set up.
> >
> > I've read in Red Hat's docs that it is "not supported" because of
> > performance issues. Multi-initiator buses should comply to SCSI
> > standards, and any SCSI-compliant disk should be able to communicate
> > with the correct controller, if I've interpreted the specs correctly. Of
> > course, you get arbitrary results when using non-compliant hardware...
> > What are other issues with multi-initiator buses, other than performance
> > loss?
>
> I set up a small 2 node cluster this way a while back, just as a testbed
> for myself. Much as I suspected, it was severely unstable because of
> the storage configuration, even occasionally causing both nodes to crash
> when one was rebooted due to SCSI bus resets. I tore it down and
> rebuilt it several times, configuring it as a simple failover cluster
> with RHEL3 and RHEL4, a GFS cluster under RHEL4 and Fedora4, and as an
> openSSI cluster using Fedora3. All tested configurations were equally
> crash-happy due to the bus resets.
>
> My configuration consisted of a couple of old Compaq deskpro PC's, each
> with a single ended Symbiosis card (set to different SCSI ID's
> obviously) and an external DEC BA360 jbod shelf with 6 drives. The bus
> resets might be mitigated somewhat by using HVD SCSI and Y-cables with
> external terminators, but from my previous experience with other
> clusters that used this technique (DEC ASE and HP-ux service guard), bus
> resets will always be a thorn in your side without a separate,
> independent raid controller to act as a go-between. Calling these
> configurations simply "not supported" is an understatement - this type
> of config is guaranteed trouble. I'd never set up a cluster this way
> unless I'm the only one using it, and only then if I don't care one
> little bit about crashes and data corruption. My two cents.
>
> -steve
Small clarification - Although clusters from DEC, HP, and even
DigiComWho?Paq's TruCluster can be made to work (sort of) on multi-
initiator SCSI busses, IIRC it was never a supported option for any of
them (much like RedHat's offering). I doubt any sane company would ever
support that type of config.
-steve
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list