[Linux-cluster] Equivalent to RHCS?
Riaan van Niekerk
riaan at obsidian.co.za
Wed Jun 28 14:41:03 UTC 2006
Jeff you are mostly correct, but I want to make a slight (but IMHO
important correction).
What you pay for is not a licence or right to use but a "subscription",
which consists of access to binaries (including updates and upgrades for
the duration of your subscription), support, certification and open source
assurance.
or s/licence/subscription/ and I second your answer.
Riaan
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Jeff Stoner wrote:
> It's all Open Source. Redhat is only obligated to make the source code
> available (whether that's through CVS, tarballs or SRPMs.) Purchasing a
> license entitles you to get support from Redhat (via phone, web or
> email) and allows you to download binary RPMs and get compiled updates
> via up2date from their servers.
>
> Without a license, you have to build the software yourself or get RPMs
> from some place like rpmfind.net, and support is pretty much limited to
> mailing lists and message forums (where you may not get an answer.)
>
>
> --Jeff
> SME - UNIX
> OpSource Inc.
>
> PGP Key ID 0x6CB364CA
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I hate to bother you guys with dumb questions, but I'm
> confused--
>
>
>
> Looking at the components, it looks like this project is the
> core of Red Hat Cluster Suite. I take it RHCS itself is not open, but
> its "root" components are? How does RHCS compare to these open
> projects?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list