[Linux-cluster] What if the fence device doesn't work?
Eric Kerin
eric at bootseg.com
Tue Nov 21 15:36:44 UTC 2006
Janne Peltonen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 09:20:20AM -0500, Eric Kerin wrote:
>
>> Janne Peltonen wrote:
>>
>> And here's an example block from the cluster.conf file first it tries
>> ilo (HP Lights Out), and if that fails, apc (APC Network power
>> controller) (the ILO sections is probably not correct, I just thew it in
>> there as an example of how you'd setup the method tags):
>> <fence>
>> <method name="ilo">
>> <device name="server1-ilo"
>> option="off"/>
>> <device name="server1-ilo"
>> option="on"/>
>> </method>
>> <method name="apc">
>> <device name="APC01a" port="1"
>> option="off"/>
>> <device name="APC01b" port="1"
>> option="off"/>
>> <device name="APC01a" port="1"
>> option="on"/>
>> <device name="APC01b" port="1"
>> option="on"/>
>> </method>
>>
>> </fence>
>>
>
> Ok, I tried a similar config and it works fine. Thanks again. One
> obstacle less on our way to a xen-csgfs-clustered imap server :)
>
> One thing, though: if the APC controller in the above config fails, it's
> still a SPOF. Or is there still something I'm missing?-)
>
>
Well, first it tries ilo. If that fails, it uses the APC. If that
fails, then we have a multipoint failure, and obviously protecting
against multipoint failure costs a lot more than protecting against a
single point failure...
Thanks,
Eric Kerin
eric at bootseg.com
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list