[Linux-cluster] Network-attached power switches for RHCS
Mohd Irwan Jamaluddin
irwan at magnifix.com.my
Tue Oct 31 06:16:26 UTC 2006
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 13:16 -0500, Lon Hohberger wrote:
> 1U APC switches are less expensive and have SNMP capabilities, but to
> feed NSPF power to a cluster, you would need at least two of them; the
> APC 9225 switches only have one power rail. This means if you trip over
> the switch's power cable, all cluster nodes powered by the APC unit die.
> APC switches can also often be daisy chained together, but our agents do
> not generally support the configuration. (I think the CVS version does
> on the most recent hardware, but probably not on the 9225... Jim?)
>
> Ex: single power supplies connected to typical APC devices:
>
> power1 power2
> | |
> server A APC1 APC2 server B
> +----1 1-----+
>
> Ex: dual power supplies connected to typical APC devices:
>
> power1
> |
> server A APC1 server B
> | +----1 | |
> | 2-------------+ |
> | |
> | APC2 |
> +-------------------1 |
> 2------------+
> |
> power2
>
>
>
> The WTI IPS800 switches above have two power rails with 4 ports each.
> The CE version is 208v; the non-CE is 110~120v, otherwise, they're the
> same. They cost more per unit than the 9225. You can control dual
> power supplies on separate rails, giving you NSPF as far as power-cords
> are concerned. If you pull one of the power sources, the power switch
> is still accessible and fencing will still work, because the internal
> electronics can run off of either power rail. (I'm not sure what the
> fault mode is if the electronics fail, though; I *think* it leaves the
> ports in their current states; contact WTI if you have questions about
> this).
>
> Ex: dual power supplies connected to typical WTI devices:
>
> power1
> |
> server A IPS server B
> +----1 |
> === |
> 5----+
> |
> power2
>
> Ex: dual power supplies connected to typical WTI devices:
>
> power1
> |
> server A IPS server B
> | +----1 | |
> | 2----+ |
> | === |
> +-----------5 |
> 6-----------+
> |
> power2
>
> >From a reliability standpoint, APC and WTI both make extremely reliable
> devices. I've never had any switch from either vendor go bonkers on me.
>
> Not to state the opinion of any company I may or may not be employed by
> or affiliated with, I personally generally prefer the WTI devices over
> APC devices because of:
>
> (a) Design - I *totally* dig the dual power rail configuration. It has
> higher power capacity per switch (30A, 15A per rail/4 ports), as well
> two power sources (note: it's *two* rails; not a single, redundant rail,
> even though the switch control electronics can run off of either rail)
>
> (b) Firmware revisions on APC devices have broken fencing agents on more
> than one occasion. (Though, this isn't so much a problem with the newer
> APC SNMP fencing agents, but I don't like setting up SNMP...).
>
> Jim Parsons (current fencing maintainer) has differing opinions on the
> matter; I believe he prefers APC units over WTI units.
>
> -- Lon
Thanks Lon for all the superb informations.
Due to support availability, I prefer APC over WTI. It's just that APC
has office in Malaysia and provide support locally.
Now the problem is; I'm not be able to use the APC9225 model due to
output voltage issue. APC9225 uses 120V while we in Malaysia use
220-240V/50Hz.
APC suggest me to use another model, APC7921[1]. Nevertheless APC7921 is
not included in Red Hat documentation as a preferred (supported???)
model. So, any idea on this issue? Is Red Hat going to support me even
though I'm using unrecommended model?
I have 2 servers to be clustered with a single service. Is it ok to use
1 network power switch, or is it recommended 2 power switches (1 power
switch per server)?
[1] http://www.apc.com/resource/include/techspec_index.cfm?
base_sku=AP7921
[2] http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/csgfs/browse/rh-cs-en/s1-
hardware-clustertable.html#TBL-HARDWARE-FENCEDEVS
--
Regards,
+--------------------------------+
| Mohd Irwan Jamaluddin |
| ## System Engineer, |
| (o_ Magnifix Sdn. Bhd. |
| //\ Tel: +603 42705073 |
| V_/_ Fax: +603 42701960 |
| http://www.magnifix.com/ |
+--------------------------------+
| "Every successful side needs |
| unsung heroes" - fcbayern.de |
+--------------------------------+
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list