[Linux-cluster] post_fail_delay versus deadnode_timeout
Riaan van Niekerk
riaan at obsidian.co.za
Tue Sep 12 10:10:13 UTC 2006
hi
We are trying to capture diskdumps when a lock_dlm kernel panic happens
and need to increase either post_fail_delay or deadnode_timeout to
prevent the dumping node from being fenced.
Is there any advantages or disadvantages to using either? Which is
recommended?
post_fail_delay and diskdump has come up previously, with some good
answers from David
http://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/2006-June/msg00037.html
note: for capturing a "sysrq t", we manually increase deadnode_timeout,
and decrease it back again, but don't have this luxury with a kernel
panic (which can happen at any time).
Riaan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: riaan.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 310 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20060912/6f66dc95/attachment.vcf>
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list