[Linux-cluster] clustat on GULM

[siman hew]

Entered a bug.Bugzilla Bug
250811<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250811>:
clustat report wrong information about rgmanager on a GULM clusterHope it
will be solved soon, which can save some work of mine, since I can not
trust/rely on clustat right now.

Thanks,

Siman

On 8/2/07, Lon Hohberger <lhh at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:22:33AM -0400, siman hew wrote:
> > I found clustat report wrong information about rgmanager when a cluster
> is
> > GULM.
> > I setup a 3-node cluster on RHEL4U5, with GULM.  There are one failover
> > domain, one resource and one service, just for testing.
> > I found clustat always report rgmanger is running after cluster is
> started.
> > With the configuration with DLM, clustat report correctly.
> > node4 is lock server, and all nodes report the same inaccurate
> information.
>
> GULM doesn't have a way to provide sub-groups really, except for users
> of lockspaces.
>
> Can you file a bugzilla about this?  I wonder if we can get the
> information for "what nodes are in this lockspace" from GULM.  If it's
> possible, we could probably fix it.
>
> --
> Lon Hohberger - Software Engineer - Red Hat, Inc.
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20070803/debef294/attachment.htm>