[Linux-cluster] clustat on GULM
simanhew at gmail.com
Fri Aug 3 18:50:45 UTC 2007
Entered a bug.Bugzilla Bug
clustat report wrong information about rgmanager on a GULM clusterHope it
will be solved soon, which can save some work of mine, since I can not
trust/rely on clustat right now.
On 8/2/07, Lon Hohberger <lhh at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:22:33AM -0400, siman hew wrote:
> > I found clustat report wrong information about rgmanager when a cluster
> > GULM.
> > I setup a 3-node cluster on RHEL4U5, with GULM. There are one failover
> > domain, one resource and one service, just for testing.
> > I found clustat always report rgmanger is running after cluster is
> > With the configuration with DLM, clustat report correctly.
> > node4 is lock server, and all nodes report the same inaccurate
> GULM doesn't have a way to provide sub-groups really, except for users
> of lockspaces.
> Can you file a bugzilla about this? I wonder if we can get the
> information for "what nodes are in this lockspace" from GULM. If it's
> possible, we could probably fix it.
> Lon Hohberger - Software Engineer - Red Hat, Inc.
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Linux-cluster