[Linux-cluster] Please correct me if I'm wrong, but...

Michael Patrimonio dmp at mjm.com
Mon Aug 20 20:55:10 UTC 2007


 
No, it does not require administrator interaction--in the service you would add a resource for the file system. This would move the file system between nodes.
 
=====
 
________________________________

From: linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com on behalf of Randy Brown
Sent: Mon 8/20/2007 16:39
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Please correct me if I'm wrong, but...


Right.  That's the way I understood it to be.  Using ext3 would require us to have to umount and remount the file systems to the each host after the failure, though, correct?  In other words, would require administrator interaction.  GFS would do this automatically without impacting the users.

Randy

Lon Hohberger wrote: 

	On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 03:26:08PM -0400, Randy Brown wrote:
	  

		in order to configure a two-node high availability NFS failover cluster, 
		I need to use GFS, correct?
		    

	You can use EXT3; you just can only mount the file system on one
	node at a time. 
	
	With GFS, you can export the same file system from *both* cluster nodes.
	
	-- Lon
	
	  

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 4299 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20070820/aa8cab1c/attachment.bin>


More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list