[Linux-cluster] DLM Locks and Memory issue

[Wendy Cheng]

Jon Erickson wrote:
> Wendy,
>
> I tried using the ko files from your directory, but I received a
> Invalid Symbol message.
>
> i running two separate clusters with the following packages.  Can you
> create a ko files that will work in these environments to test?
I'm buried in two other urgent issues at this moment so this could take 
a while before I can get to it. The best way is for you to contact Red 
Hat support if you can.

-- Wendy
>
> Envirorment One  x86_64
> uname -r = 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp
> GFS-6.1.6-1
> GFS-kernel-smp-2.6.9-60.3
> GFS-kernheaders-2.6.9-60.3
>
> Enviroment Two i686
> uname -r = 2.6.9-34.0.1.ELhudemem
> GFS-kernel-hugemem-2.6.9-49-1.1
> GFS-kernheaders.2.6.9-49.1.1
> GFS-6.1.5-0
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> Thanks,
> Jon
>
>
> On 2/13/07, Wendy Cheng <wcheng at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Jon Erickson wrote:
>> > All,
>> >
>> > I've been testing GFS with millions and millions of files and my
>> > system performance degrades as the number of locks increases.  Along
>> > with the number of locks being in the millions, all of my system
>> > memory is used.  After performing a umount and mount of my GFS file
>> > system the locks go back down to zero and all the memory is reclaimed.
>> > This of course improves my system performance.  Is there a way to
>> > release all locks and memory associated without unmounting my file
>> > system?
>> >
>> > Should I try the patch in the bug report?
>> > Comment #31: 
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214239
>> >
>> Yes, please do.  Check out:
>>
>> http://people.redhat.com/wcheng/Patches/GFS/R4/readme
>>
>> -- Wendy
>>
>> -- 
>> Linux-cluster mailing list
>> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>>
>
>